Enabling Wall Street's Gambling Problem
Thought bankers had learned their lesson in 2008? Think again.
After the financial meltdown of 2008, I remember thinking that I wouldn't be running into Wall Street lobbyists much anymore in the halls of Congress.
If you'd just driven the economy off a cliff, wouldn't you be embarrassed to show your face on Capitol Hill? And surely, I thought, these firms wouldn't spend their taxpayer bailout money on high-priced lobbyists.
Boy, was I naive. Last year alone, Wall Street spent more than $200 million to block efforts to rein in their recklessness.
And the investment is paying off. The financial reform bills moving through Congress are full of holes for greedy bankers to exploit.
Just look at the Senate Democrats' new bill. One place you can see the Wall Street lobbyists' handiwork is in all the exemptions for derivatives, the complicated financial instruments blamed for accelerating the crisis.
Analysts say the bill would exempt up to 40 percent of derivatives from being traded on open exchanges. This means that high flyers could still do their riskiest gambling in secret — far from the eyes of any regulator cops.
This type of over-the-counter trading is kind of like backroom poker. In most cases, it adds no value to the real economy, so it's exactly like betting. Except if the game goes really badly, it's not one unlucky gambler who stands to lose his shirt — it's the entire economy.
You'd think we would've learned this lesson after the AIG debacle. The insurance giant was a hopeless gambling addict. It issued gazillions of so-called credit default swaps, particularly crazy deals that were supposed to be like insurance against bad investments, but weren't backed up with actual capital.
Thanks to deregulation, AIG was able to conceal its bets from government regulators, much like the husband who hides his gambling problem from his wife until the goons show up to collect.
Once the subprime mortgage crisis erupted and the market began to crash, AIG couldn't make good on its bets. But instead of getting whacked in the knees, AIG got a $180 billion taxpayer rescue.
And AIG was hardly playing alone in the backroom betting parlor. Although government regulators still should've seen the crash coming, Wall Street's frenzied betting in the secret derivatives market made it more difficult.
While we're still struggling to recover from the catastrophe, it should be unimaginable that derivatives not be subject at least to a modest requirement that they be traded on exchanges.
This reform alone wouldn't be enough to prevent another crisis. But if Congress can't crack down on backroom betting, are they up to the bigger job of transforming our casino economy into one that meets real economic needs?